Who Owns the Copyright in the Now Famous Oscar Selfie?

Ellen DeGeneres Selfie

Unless you’ve been living under a rock these past few days, you have probably seen the Ellen DeGeneres orchestrated selfie.  For a recap, Ellen wanted to beat the all-time record for re-tweets by gathering a gaggle of actors and actresses for a group selfie. She used a Samsung phone for the photo, which was a prop provided by Samsung, one of the sponsors at the Oscars. The camera required some distance to encompass the whole group, so Ellen handed the camera off to Bradley Cooper, who by virtue of being at the front and having with longer arms than Ellen, took the iconic photo.

But who actually owns the copyright for the photo?  There are actually four potential players: Bradley Cooper, The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, Samsung, and Ellen DeGeneres. The Associated Press thinks it is Ellen DeGeneres.  They asked her for permission to use the photo, which she granted.  However, traditionally, copyright ownership goes to the photo’s creator, which is usually the person that takes the photo.  In this case, that is Bradley Cooper.

All that is required for a creative work to be given copyright protection is that it is an original work, fixed in a tangible medium (which for digital photos means that it is recorded by the cameras sensor), and has a minimal degree of creativity.

Was there even a minimal amount of creativity on the part of Bradley Cooper?  Ellen just gave him the camera, but the shot was her idea? Well, the problem with that line of thinking is that ideas are not copyrightable, only the execution of the idea, which in this case came from Cooper.

The requirements for “minimal degree of creativity” is a fairly low bar. In the days of film cameras, using a camera required moderate technical knowledge; choice of film type and that films light sensitivity (ISO), camera types and styles, choice of lens, shutter speed, aperture and a host of other technical consideration all came into play for even the most mundane photos.  Those choices were considered creative functions.  Today, everyone has a camera in his or her pocket that for the most part, are just point and shoot.  The camera does the rest.  The photographer can choose filters from Instagram or other apps, but that is really just creating a derivative of the original photo.  So in some sense, many of those creative choices are lost. 

But still, a person taking a photo composes the shot, chooses the camera angles, captures the correct lighting, and frames the image, etc., which are all creative choices.  Even a quick spur of the moment shot, like a selfie, still rises to the level of creativity required for copyright protection.

Copyright usually resides with the person who takes the photo, which in this case is Bradley Cooper.

What about Samsung and the Academy?  The camera was not Ellen’s. Samsung provided it by virtue of its advertising agreement with the Academy. Generally, when someone who is hired to take a photo, the copyright holder remains with the photographer. However, in some cases where the photographer is an employee or there is a written agreement that work is “made for hire.,” the copyright holder can be the hiring party. Perhaps if Ellen was directed to create a selfie by Samsung or the Academy, and Ellen’s contract signifies it is a work made for hire, then Samsung or the Academy could be the copyright holder. But we still have the wrinkle that Ellen was not the photographer.

Eric Spiegelman, a Los Angeles Entertainment Lawyer, has an interesting take.  He presented a case for sole ownership by DeGeneres in The Wire suggesting that, “Ellen DeGeneres came up with the idea for the selfie and proceeded to execute it. In the process of producing the selfie, it became apparent that she needed a crew, and Bradley Cooper took in upon himself to be this photographer. Ellen DeGeneres, of course, consented to his involvement. At that moment, the services of Bradley Cooper were employed by Ellen Degeneres for some non-financial compensation (the added fame of being a part of Hollywood history, perhaps).

He goes on to say that, “Usually, when an individual creative contribution becomes part of a “work made for hire,” it’s clearly spelled out in a written contract. Here, the parties did not have enough time to draw up an agreement. But Bradley Cooper has been working in Hollywood long enough to know that when he is employed in the production of a picture, it’s always a “work for hire” situation. On every movie he’s ever made, he signed a contract stating as much. Everyone who contributes anything creative to a film signs a similar agreement. As such, Bradley Cooper is aware of the standard business practice of this industry and can be reasonably expected to operate in the same way in the absence of a written contract.”

Who the real owner is we will probably never know. Copyright ownership will remain with Ellen, unless Cooper, Samsung or the Academy contests it.  That doesn’t seem likely, so for now, we can say that Ellen DeGeneres’ selfie holds the record for the most re-tweets.

About the author

Steve Schlackman

As a photographer and Patent Attorney with a background in marketing, Steve has a unique perspective on art and law. Should you have any questions on Intellectual Property contact him at [email protected] His photography can be seen online at or on display at the Emmanuel Fremin Gallery in New York City.


Click here to post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Could it be reasonable to suggestion, by virtue of the original intent and usage of the photo, that having been published and republished, used and reused freely, no one owns it? By posting it on public sites for the purpose of free distribution, hasn’t DeGeneres released her copyrights and placed it in the public domain?

    • It actually a bit more complicated. At this point, if Ellen were the owner, she retains the copyright and could ask that the photo be taken off anything that isn’t Twitter related. What you are seeing around the web is mostly editor and retweets. For Twitter, Ellen is bound by their Terms of Service which allows all the retweets. Much of the other views on the web are editorials content. Since editorial content is carved out as a Fair Use, I can use it for the header here. If ti were in the public domain then the image would be free to use anywhere on anything, including websites, t-shirts, product packaging or even used to make other works. Ellen hasn’t given that permission and until she does, she retains the rights and can enforce them whenever and to whoever she wants. She has the rights, she doesn’t have to enforce them though, but technically, she won’t lose them. Also, There is also the Right of Publicity for all the people in the picture. They have given inherent approval to use the image for Twitter, since they knew that it was for Twitter, but they didn’t necessarily approve their likeness for more than that.


We built Orangenius to help creators succeed. Our comprehensive platform takes the guesswork out of the business of art, so you can focus on creating. Click to see how Orangenius is revolutionizing the creative economy.


The Latest From Artrepreneur

  • How to Earn Your Living as a Travel Photographer

    The prospect of traveling the world while getting paid to work may seem farfetched, but these two photographers have the ticket to landing freelance creative work across the globe. Here, Andy Donohoe and Michaela Trimble share their advice for […]

  • A Recruiter’s Advice for your Video or Motion Design Reel

    Creative Circle recruiter Brooks Rowlett sifts through hundreds of motion design reels and video editor portfolios each week. Here, he shares his best advice for motion designers and video editors looking to land their next big gig. The post A […]

  • From Tattoo Artist to Brand Empire: The Rise of the Ink Mogul

    The savvy tattoo artist uses brand recognition to launch a multimedia business. These four artists have leveraged their underground celebrity status to build a brand empire, complete with product lines, book deals, and TV contracts. The post From […]

  • Exploring the Intersection of Art and Technology

    The advent of technology is re-shaping the practice of art. These educational institutions, artists, and startups are exploring art and technology's convergence in today's increasingly digital world. The post Exploring the Intersection of Art and […]

  • Work with an Artist Mentor to Get Your Career on Track

    Many of the world's most recognized artists sought inspiration and guidance from their peers. Gain insight into your practice and learn about the business of art by finding an artist mentor whose career aligns with your own vision for success. The […]

  • Why Artists Need to Make Copyright Registration a Priority

    Sharing, posting, and distributing your work online is easier than ever - but often times, visual artists find themselves dealing with online piracy issues as a result of that practice. Initiating a copyright registration routine can curb the […]

  • How Artists on Social Media Can Grow Their Following

    By sticking to the tenets of the social media pyramid, artists on social media can develop an engaged audience. The post How Artists on Social Media Can Grow Their Following appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • How [and Where] to Submit an Art Fair Application

    Submitting an art fair application doesn't have to be an arduous process. We break down which fairs are currently accepting submissions, and how you should apply. The post How [and Where] to Submit an Art Fair Application appeared first on […]

  • The Paperwork Behind Your Art Business [Part I]

    In this ongoing series, we'll review the various documents needed to get your art business up and running. First up: Crafting your artist proposal. The post The Paperwork Behind Your Art Business [Part I] appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • A Creative Career Coach Outlines a Strategy for the Working Artist

    Marc Zegans coaches artists planning the next move in their art careers. Here, he shares his proven approach for developing your practice as a working artist. The post A Creative Career Coach Outlines a Strategy for the Working Artist appeared first […]

  • How One Artist Uses Instagram to Land Consistent Illustration Gigs

    Illustrator Maria Luque's secret to landing a steady stream of illustration gigs? Just be consistent and post regularly on Instagram. The post How One Artist Uses Instagram to Land Consistent Illustration Gigs appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Artists Who Failed – And Found Success Anyway

    Some of the world's most successful artists weren't always so revered. Meet five artists who failed to develop their art careers during their lifetime. The post Artists Who Failed – And Found Success Anyway appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • How Do Online Content Moderation Policies Treat Nudity in Art?

    As Facebook's online content moderation policies come under fire, we review creative platform Orangenius' policy on nudity in art. The post How Do Online Content Moderation Policies Treat Nudity in Art? appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Self Employed? Five Ways To Get Into the Creative Habit

    Self-employed artists don't always leave room for inspiration. Boost productivity and get into the creative habit with these proven strategies. The post Self Employed? Five Ways To Get Into the Creative Habit appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • A Creative in a Corporate Organization: Related Group’s Art Department

    In this ongoing series, we explore the creative roles available in the most unlikely of corporations. Our first installment talks to Patricia Hanna, the Art Director of Related Group. The post A Creative in a Corporate Organization: Related […]