Home | Copyright | Video Creators are Losing Millions from Facebook Video Posts

Video Creators are Losing Millions from Facebook Video Posts

Copyright Infringement

Facebook is once again embroiled in a public battle this time over video posts that are costing YouTube creators millions of dollars in lost profits. Over the course of the past year, Facebook has enhanced its platform to focus on video, so that users can share and watch video content directly on the site without having to take the Facebook user to another platform. CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently announced that Facebook had increased its daily video views to 4 billion, an unprecedented increase from 1 million in September 2014. Many of the videos that are posted and viewed on Facebook tend to be originated on YouTube, the largest video hosting site in the world.

But the average user posting content on Facebook is doing so without permission from the original creators, and that’s costing serious YouTube content producers some pretty serious money.

Just ask popular YouTube stars Hank Green and Jack Douglass – both internet success stories have cried some very public grievances concerning Facebook’s video business, which so far does not have a system in place to prevent copyright infringement by its users, and it’s cost Green and Douglass substantial losses in potential income.

In 2007, YouTube launched a program that split the revenue for ads it ran alongside videos with the people who made them. Video creators were offered an earnings system based on the amount of views their videos collected: the higher the views, the bigger the income. As reported by Atlanta’s Wabe.org, it took Douglass years to earn the following on YouTube that resulted in Douglass being able to live off his comedy videos.

But once Facebook launched its video platform, Douglass had a problem: In one of several instances, a very popular Facebook group, which has millions of followers, posted his video to Facebook. The video garnered millions of views within the first hour. Because the video wasn’t being viewed through YouTube, Douglass was not able to capitalize on the ad revenue system he enjoyed with YouTube. And because the video had received such widespread attention within the first hour, by the time Douglass got the group to remove the video from Facebook, his earnings capacity was already gone: The video had become stale in the fast-paced, fickle trends of the internet. The result was almost $20,000 in lost profits from Douglass’s video.DMCA

Douglass’s story serves as a great reminder that re-posting content on the internet can have legal ramifications. Do YouTube stars have any options for regaining their lost profits from Facebook? What are some of the solutions Facebook has promised content creators?

Why Posting a YouTube Video to Facebook is Copyright Infringement

As we’ve outlined in our free copyright e-book, the Law of Creativity, YouTube video creators undoubtedly have a copyright in the works they create: their original works of authorship, fixed in a tangible medium, with a minimal degree of creativity. As the copyright holder of a protected video, only the YouTube content creator has the right to distribute, display, or make derivatives of the work in question. So when a Facebook user uploads a protected video without the express permission of the copyright owner, they are infringing. Seems like a pretty open-and-shut case right? Not quite – thanks to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), Facebook is protected from being sued for copyright infringement, so long as it takes the offending material down.

Facebook’s Safe Harbor Under the DMCA

As an internet service provider, Facebook is afforded certain protections under the DMCA, which has shielded the company from facing any lawsuits from YouTube creators. As we’ve previously discussed in our article on Grooveshark and the DMCA, Facebook is protected so long as it has a system in place for removing allegedly infringing content. Once a YouTube creator has detected an infringer, they must notify Facebook, who is required to take the material down promptly. Once Facebook removes the content, they must notify the infringer, who has the option of serving Facebook a counter-notice alleging (under penalty of perjury) that he or she believes the material was improperly taken down. At that point, the copyright holder has 14 days to file a lawsuit. If they don’t, Facebook is permitted to re-upload the infringing content.

This system is somewhat troublesome because it requires quite a bit of work and upkeep on the part of the copyright holder, and assumes that users are working on an honor system when counterclaiming infringement notices. For example, if a repeat infringer can be certain that the copyright holder likely won’t file a lawsuit, they can allege that their infringement was fair use and likely get away with their lie without any legal ramifications.

Additionally, the DMCA requires Facebook to have a system in place for discouraging and dealing with repeat infringers, which it currently does not. In fact, copyright infringement is rampant on Facebook, with major celebrities with large followings using copyrighted videos to promote their own goods and services. In fact, in order to comply with the DMCA, Facebook should be terminating accounts of those repeat infringers.

Facebook’s New Plan for Dealing with Copyright Infringement

Under the DMCA, Facebook is required to have a plan for dealing with repeat copyright infringers. While the company has alleged it has measures in place to address copyright infringement, including suspending accounts guilty of repeated violations, many are concerned about the efficacy of this policy. In an effort to put users at ease, Facebook has announced it will introduce a new video matching technology product designed to identify videos uploaded as duplicates of videos already uploaded directly by the creators. According to one of Facebook’s recent blog posts, this new technology is tailored to Facebook’s platform, and will allow creators to identify matches of their videos on Facebook across “pages, profiles, groups, and geographies.”

DMCABut it’s important to note that Facebook’s new technology puts the burden on the creator to identify the impermissibly uploaded video. Creators will have access to a Web-based dashboard that will allow them to identify videos they’d like to monitor. If the system finds a matching video, the creators then have the option to report the clips to Facebook. It’s an almost impossible burden for creators, since their work often spreads like wildfire across the internet. Requiring users to register the videos they wish to protect is an additional step that programs like Google’s Content ID, which finds videos posted without permission and flags it for content creators automatically.

Additionally, Facebook doesn’t have any sort of ad sharing revenue system in place to ensure video creators get paid for their content – despite the fact that such a plan would likely drum up its video business significantly, since it would provide incentives for people to create videos specifically for Facebook.

While Facebook’s poor copyright infringement policies are certainly making waves among the YouTube content creator community, the company’s nonchalance doesn’t exactly come as a surprise: the company should focus on shifting its often questionable standard of ethics with the fervor with which they increase their bottom line.

Are you a content creator on YouTube? Do you find yourself at a loss to deal with Facebook’s lax policies for protecting your content? Feel free to email us with your questions.

About the author

Nicole Martinez

Nicole is a writer and law school graduate with a dedicated focus and passion for the arts, and a particular interest in Latin American art and history. Nicole has extensive experience working with art galleries and museums in Buenos Aires and Miami, and explores cultural landscapes across the Americas through her writing.

You can e-mail Nicole at nicole@orangenius.com.


Click here to post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Very good site you have here but I was wanting to know if you knew of any
    discussion boards that cover the same topics talked about here?
    I’d really like to be a part of online community where
    I can get responses from other experienced individuals that share
    the same interest. If you have any suggestions, please let me know.
    Appreciate it!

  • In addition, FYI, to file a law suit, the copyright owner must have at least applied for registration for the content before filing suit. Another burden. It will take a collective of successful You Tube creators to create a program of action to counter this unfortunate situation. May be even a coalition. Perhaps, Facebook could be forced to institute a policy that nothing may be posted from You Tube without the consent of the person who posted it to You Tube? Or a change in the law is necessary?

{{Privy:Embed campaign=133844}}

The Latest From Artrepreneur

  • How to Implement a Powerful Art Marketing Strategy

    How can artists implement an art marketing plan that’s both measurable and effective? Artrepreneur reviews some proven marketing strategies for artists.The post How to Implement a Powerful Art Marketing Strategy appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • A Guide to Eliminating Artist Debt and Sticking to a Budget

    The average working artist faces student loans and other debt. We ask several financial experts how they coach artists through managing artist debt while budgeting for their creative business.The post A Guide to Eliminating Artist Debt and Sticking […]

  • This CERF+ Workshop Will Teach Artists to Manage Risk

    This week, CERF+ will host a workshop for Gatlinburg artists. "Ready and Resilient" will cover topics in disaster preparedness along with a host of others focused around managing an art business.The post This CERF+ Workshop Will Teach Artists to […]

  • Jeffrey Deitch Reveals His Secrets to Sell Art

    Knowledge@Wharton and Orangenius present an interview with Jeffrey Deitch, a pervasive figure in the world of contemporary art. Listen to the full podcast here.The post Jeffrey Deitch Reveals His Secrets to Sell Art appeared first on […]

  • How to Attract the Right Artist Opportunities

    While being selected for the right artist opportunities can feel like a murky process, there are straightforward ways to move forward with advancing your career with help from your artist network.The post How to Attract the Right Artist […]

  • 10 Interview Questions Artists Must Be Able to Answer

    If you've secured that important sit-down with a potential collector, arts journalist, or gallerist, be prepared to answer these common artist interview questions during your initial meeting.The post 10 Interview Questions Artists Must Be Able to […]

  • Secured a Studio Visit? Here’s How to Keep Your Visitor Hooked

    Artists often underestimate the importance of follow-up after an artist studio visit. Here's how to wow curators, art critics, and collectors that made the time to visit your space.The post Secured a Studio Visit? Here’s How to Keep Your […]

  • Artists are Partnering with Independent Designers, Retail Brands

    Artists and graphic designers are breaking into fashion graphic design by collaborating with independent designers and fast fashion brands. We talk to two designers on these increasingly prevalent partnerships.The post Artists are Partnering with […]

  • How An Estate Tax Repeal Might Affect the Art World

    A GOP repeal of the estate tax could produce a chilling effect on art museum donations while creating a bump in the art market. Here's why private art collectors may be less inclined to donate art.The post How An Estate Tax Repeal Might Affect the […]

  • 3 Common Pitfalls to Avoid in a Photography Contract

    A photography contract that doesn't consider art licensing rights and work made for hire agreements can have a significant impact on a photographer's business. Here are the common pitfalls photographers need to avoid.The post 3 Common Pitfalls to […]