Copyright

Is a new Copyright Office on the Horizon?

Library of Congress
WASHINGTON, D.C. - APRIL 12, 2015: The Library of Congress in Washington. The library officially serves the U.S. Congress.

While there are many words or phrases used to describe the Copyright Office registration system,  “excellent,” “easy-to-use,” or “visually appealing,” are not among them.  In fact, don’t be surprised if the Obamacare rollout disaster has a higher approval rating than eCo; that is unless the user has a penchant for confusing interface and a site design reminiscent of websites from the early 1990s. Given the increasing importance copyright plays in economic growth, it is a bit surprising. In fact, IP-based businesses drive more economic growth than any other industry sector.  According to a 2014 report by the International Intellectual Property Alliance, copyright contributed more than $1.1 trillion to the U.S. economy in 2013 (or about 6.7% of GDP), and is responsible for creating almost 5.5 million jobs. Even the founding fathers knew the important role of intellectual property, enshrining its protection in the Constitution, Article I, Section 8:

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

The inclusion of the Copyright Clause in the Constitution is significant.  The Constitution is both the oldest and shortest (only about 4,400 words) written Constitution of any major government in the world.  Its main purpose is to lay out the functional framework for the federal governmental, including the three branches, the separation of powers, and the rights and responsibilities of state governments along with their relationship to the federal government. Within that short document, the writers specifically call out Copyright.  The Copyright Clause was one of the first to pass, unanimously in early 1787, whereas restrictions to government power and important civil liberties, such as freedom of speech and the right to bear arms, were added in later amendments.

Library of Congress
Continental Congress 1787

So it’s rather surprising that while the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, (which governs the other two areas of intellectual property,) is a self-governing and self-funded agency (and the only Agency that operates solely on fees collected by its users, and not on taxpayer dollars), the Copyright Office is not independent, but part of the Library of Congress.  Unfortunately, that means ultimate control of the department falls within the purview of the Librarian of Congress, where copyright is just one of a broader portfolio of responsibilities.  The result is that the head of the Copyright Office has no autonomy, so content creators suffer the consequences.

While the Library has been praised for making government information accessible and creating the World Digital Library, James Billington, the current Librarian has also been criticized for not keeping up with advances in technology. A Government Accountability Office study found persisting failures in the Library’s computer management systems and cited Billington’s failure to hire a permanent chief information officer as a major roadblock. “The library does not have the leadership needed to address these IT management weaknesses,” the GAO said. So after 30 years as Librarian, On June 10, 2015, Billington announced he is stepping down, paving the way for a modernization of the Copyright Office.

Now, Reps. Judy Chu (D-Calif.) and Tom Marino (R-Pa) are taking up the call for change.  They have circulated a bipartisan draft bill, the Copyright Office for the Digital Economy [CODE] Act, that would make the Copyright Office an independent agency in an effort to make it more agile, with the ability to respond more easily and effectively to the unique challenges of the digital age.

Is the Copyright Office Registration System Necessary?

Since copyright is automatic, available as soon as the copyrighted work is fixed in a tangible medium, (i.e. putting pen to paper or a photo hitting he camera sensor) then why do we need to register works at all?  Registration does have some distinct advantages that are beneficial to  visual artists; specifically guaranteed monetary awards, known as statutory damages, and payment of the copyright holder’s legal fees by the infringer in a copyright infringement lawsuit.

Statutory Damages

Under the Copyright Act, the copyright holder will receive between $750 and $30,000 per infringement, plus attorney’s fees and costs if they win. Also, if the infringement is proven to be willful, (for example, the infringer continues to use the image even after a request is made for removal) then awards can go up to $150,000 per infringement. Because copyright infringement is a strict liability law, intent or any reason as to why the person infringed doesn’t matter. If the infringer displays, copies, makes derivatives or distributes the work, without permission, they are guilty, even if they thought they had the permission. So guilt is usually not the issue, its how much is the infringement worth. Without registration though, many infringement cases are only worth a small amount, often less than the cost of suing for the removal. With registration, the copyright holder is guaranteed at least $750, but since legal fees are almost always reimbursed by the infringer, the copyright holder will have no problem finding an attorney to assert their rights.

Unfortunately, less than 1% of visual artists register their work, despite the low cost and the high level of protection available through registration.  Primarily due to the difficult registration process and the lack of public awareness as to the benefits of registration.

The Dreaded Copyright Office Experience

Copyright Office
Mathew Broderick in Wargames (1983)

What makes registration such a difficult process?  Surprisingly, the Copyright Office is still primarily a paper based system. For example, newspapers must submit their works in microfiche.  Half the people reading this article probably don’t even know what microfiche is while the remainder haven’t seeing since Mathew Broderick used Microfiche to do research on Dr. Stephen Falken in the 1983 film, Wargames. The result is that newspapers have stopped registering their works with the Copyright Office.  Visual artists, on the other hand, do have an online system; the Electronic Copyright Office (eCo), but, unfortunately, other than alleviating the need for paper, eCo does little to ease the registration process. ECo provides only minimal functionality, lacking even some basic operations expected from an image-based system. As well, ECo’s user interface (UI) is more akin to something seen on AMCs Halt and Catch Fire rather than what we normally expect from a modern interface.

For example, one item conspicuously absent from eCo’s are images.  eCo only allows a user to view a written description of the images, although high-resolution images are uploaded as part of the registration process.  This can be a problem when a user needs the registration number for  someone else’s image since the description input by the user may not be sufficient to know whether it is the right image.   For photographers registering multiple photos together, without proper naming conventions, it may be difficult to know which images is which.

The Copyright Office generally requires that each work be registered separately at a cost of costs $35 per registration. However, under the photographer’s exception, up to 750 photos can be registered together for $55, if all the photos are created by the same person and all were taken in the same calendar year. Photographers will usually use a naming convention for the uploaded photos since camera file names are not unique.  Since naming individual photos would be too time consuming, man photographers will batch rename their photos using tools like Photoshop bridge or Lightroom.  A photographer shooting for a spread in Vogue might use a naming convention such as “Client_date_place_number” i.e. Vogue_01/05/2015_MiamiBeach-0003.jpg. The photographer uploads a zipped file of the photos to eCo. After the Copyright Office approves the registration, they will send the photographer a registration certificate which lists all of the photos by name, with their associated registration numbers; . . . but no images.

If the photographer loses the uploaded zip file or the folder containing the renamed photos (they may still have the original photos), then knowing which photos belong to which registration number may be impossible. To resolve the issue, the photographer must make a special request to the Copyright Office asking for a hard copy of the photos with their filenames; a process that can cost well over over $1000, especially if the service needs to be expedited. How many managerial levels were involved in approving a multimillion-dollar image-centric copyright registration system that fails to support viewable images?  Clearly, not enough. Plus, there are many instances where eCo just doesn’t work.  When the Software and Information Industry Association used the “Godfather,” for a test search, neither the movie nor the novel it was based on appeared in the first 25 results.

And photos aren’t the only problem area for the Copyright Office.  A recent article in the L.A. Times tells the story of documentary filmmaker working on a film about Jewish heroes but to find the records she needed, had to send someone, in person, to the Copyright Office headquarters in Washington to look through hard copies of old documents. She could have hired Copyright Office staff to do the search, but the Copyright Office charges $200 an hour, As well, the Office said that the search would take at least six weeks. Flying someone to D.C.  was both faster and less expensive

Of course, solving technology problems at Government institutions are often difficult due to the overwhelming bureaucracy, as well as budget cutting that frequently leaves technology updates on the chopping block. Some departments will turn to free-market solutions as a gap filler. Given eCo’s poor user interface and horrible user experience, one would expect to see several startups hit the market with their own software solutions, yet we see none.  Why?  Because the Copyright Office’s software development team also failed to provide an application program interface (API) that would allow outside software initiatives to connect with the eCo database. Facebook, LinkedIn, Amazon, Instagram, Twitter and just about any other major site have APIs.  Tinder’s ability to access Facebook profiles is determined by the Facebook API.  Without an API, no third party software can access data within the eCo database, so no free market solutions are forthcoming.

The New Copyright Office

With Billington on his way out, there is finally a push to resolve the technology and process issues plaguing the Copyright Office. Maria Pallante, the new head of the Copyright Office, believes that the only way for the Copyright Office to fix its gargantuan problems is to extricate itself from the Library of Congress and become an independent agency. The Copyright Office became part of the Library in Congress in 1890 mostly out of convenience. At that time, copyright was not automatic but required three things; a registration with the Copyright Office, the submission of two copies of the registered work, and a © notice affixed to the work. With photography not having matured and silent films only a future glimmer, the majority of registrations in 1890 were books, so it made sense for the Copyright Office to be part of the Library of Congress, especially given the two submitted copies were housed at the Library.

Copyright Office
Rotunda for the Charters of Freedom – National Archives.

Times have changed and it is time for the Copyright Office to change as well.  So, Pallante has launched a serious internal lobbying campaign to separate the Office from the Library, arguing publicly that the office needs independence. Unfortunately, Pallante feels she is hamstrung because she doesn’t have control over her Office.  The budget comes from the Library and the outlay is at the whim of the Librarian.  As well, the Librarian has final say on any regulations the Copyright Office issues. The Librarian has repeatedly denied what some consider a basic necessity; building an independent IT staff that would focus on Copyright Office needs. Currently, the Copyright Office maintain an IT staff of only 23 people, who are primarily liaisons to the Library’s much larger IT staff.

Pallante has no authority over the larger Library staff and as she stated in a recent report from the Government Accountability Office, is frustrated with the “breakdown in communication” about IT with the Library. With minimal control over IT staff and without the independent authority to request money to update the Office technology, there is little that can be done to improve things.  Although it remains to be seen how the next Librarian will handle requests for system updates and IT support, an important economic driver like copyright should not be subject to the Library or the Librarian’s shifting priorities.

The CODE Act

Finally, Pallante and her supporters may get just what they want if Representatives Chu and Marino can pull it off.  Both are senior members on the House Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over the Copyright Office. Their draft legislation, Copyright Office for the Digital Economy Act (CODE Act), lays out suggested reforms regarding the way the U.S. Copyright Office operates.

A detailed summary of the Code ACT highlights the key initiatives:

  • Establishes the U.S. Copyright Office as an independent agency.
  • Provides that the President will appoint a Director for one 10-year term upon the advice of a bipartisan, bicameral commission, and with consent of the Senate.
  • Transfers administrative functions and legal duties from the Library to the Copyright Office.
  • Allows the Copyright Office to deliver any and all communications directly to the legislative branch, free of executive review
  • Would allow the Copyright Office to physically move out of the Library and into a new federal building

Of course, not everyone is happy about the proposed changes. There are always stakeholders with significant resources that may oppose a new initiative and the CODE Act is no different. One vocal critic is the President of the American Library Association (ALA), Courtney Young.  She says, “[t]he bill’s proposal to make the Copyright Office an independent agency does not address the longstanding problems facing the agency . . . specifically that the Copyright Office’s information technology systems are woefully inadequate in serving both rights holders and the public in the digital environment.” As an independent agency, there is no guarantee that Copyright Office will receive the funding they need to upgrade their technological infrastructure, however, in my opinion, it would be highly unlikely for Congress to take the huge step of making the Office an independent agency while at the same time refusing to provide the necessary resources to solve its problems.

Either way, don’t expect the CODE Act to be approved overnight. The bill is only in its draft phase and probably won’t be introduced, assuming it has the support, until late 2016 or early 2017.  On the bright side though, there are very few items other than the Code Act on the Congressional agenda that has the opportunity to gain bipartisan support.  This bill may turn out to be one of the things that Congress can rally around, showing its disillusioned constituencies that the legislative body can accomplish something.  Of course, the Obama administration has yet to weigh in on whether it supports the proposal, which can make or break the initiative. As well, there are other members of Congress who believe that rather than making the agency independent, it should be folded into the United States Patent and Trademark Office, combining all three major areas of Intellectual Property under one roof. So expect a competing proposal at some point.

_______

In the end, the one undeniable fact that almost everyone agrees on is that the Copyright Act has become progressively less comprehensible to creators while at the same time is increasingly important to those same creators as well as the overall economy. The status quo is just not cutting it.

As Senator Chu puts it: “We must act to bring the Copyright Office into the modern age. The copyright industries are responsible for millions of jobs and billions of dollars in our economy, yet the office responsible is running on analog in a digital world. We need a Copyright Office that serves the needs of owners, users, and the American public. This includes giving the office independence and sound legal ground to perform its core mission to administer the Copyright Act.”

What do you think about the proposed modernization of the Copyright Office?  Let us know in the comments section below.  As well, if you have any questions about this issue or other copyright-related questions, email me at [email protected]

About the author

Steve Schlackman

As a photographer and Patent Attorney with a background in marketing, Steve has a unique perspective on art and law. Should you have any questions on Intellectual Property contact him at [email protected] His photography can be seen online at Fotofilosophy.com or on display at the Emmanuel Fremin Gallery in New York City.

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Orangenius Has Launched!

Orangenius

.

The Latest From Artrepreneur

  • Eight Artist in Residence Programs to Launch Your Career

    We’ve previously reviewed how important it is to craft a bio and resume that details your art career, and today we’ll discuss one essential element that’s sure to make your career stand out: the Artist in Residence. Artist in […]

  • Write an Artist Bio to Get Noticed

    Most artists are used to expressing themselves in creative ways, but fewer understand the importance of expressing who they are in words. In this article, we'll review the creating an artist bio while offering some useful tips on its content. The […]

  • Balancing a Full-Time Job with Fulfilling Creativity

    Need more time in your day to work on creative endeavors? Here are few ideas that may help. The post Balancing a Full-Time Job with Fulfilling Creativity appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Launching an Art Startup? These Online Resources Can Help.

    Launching your own art startup can be scary. Here are a few tips and online resources that may help. The post Launching an Art Startup? These Online Resources Can Help. appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Expanding Your Art Business Beyond You [Part 2]

    Are you ready to expand your art business? Here's what you need to know about hiring and terminating employees, employee retirement plans and vacation and sick leave. The post Expanding Your Art Business Beyond You [Part 2] appeared first on […]

  • You Don’t Have to be an Artist to Work with Art

    Just because you don’t possess any artistic abilities – or just because you haven’t made it as an artist yet – doesn’t mean you can’t have a creative, art-filled career. There are plenty of “art […]

  • Expanding Your Art Business Beyond You

    Artists successfully running their own art business may be ready to hire an employee. We've covered everything you need to know, from tax requirements to insurance obligations. The post Expanding Your Art Business Beyond You appeared first on […]

  • What Photographers Need to Know About Shooting People [with Cameras]

    In this article, we'll review a key example of publicity and privacy issues, and what you need to know to keep your photography in the clear. The post What Photographers Need to Know About Shooting People [with Cameras] appeared first on […]

  • Getting What You Want: Basic Negotiation Tips For Creatives

    Selling and negotiating can be very intimidating. Fear not! Here are some common sense tips to negotiation that can help you get what you want. The post Getting What You Want: Basic Negotiation Tips For Creatives appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • How to Sell Art [Without Being Annoying]

    Most artists will tell you that the hardest part of their job is trying to sell their artwork to the masses. Sure, they love the creativity and the freedom being an artist provides, but how can they make a living unless they sell their work? While […]

  • Museums Deck the Halls with Holiday Cheer for All

    Check out seasonal exhibits from some of the country’s top art museums. The post Museums Deck the Halls with Holiday Cheer for All appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Why Galleries Should Get Down with Art Fairs [A Useful Guide]

    As we're winding down from celebrating Art Basel Miami Beach, we're thinking about all the different ways galleries and artists can benefit from participating in these international art fairs. The post Why Galleries Should Get Down with Art Fairs [A […]

  • Your All Access Pass to Art Basel

    Dying to tackle Art Basel Miami Beach, but not sure where to start? You won't want to miss these stunning displays of the best of contemporary art. The post Your All Access Pass to Art Basel appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Get Your Networking on at Miami Art Week

    Miami Art Week is the perfect time for artists to network and gather contacts to keep building an art business. Check out five events primed to bring new opportunities. The post Get Your Networking on at Miami Art Week appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • The Garment District: From Buttons and Bows to a Home for Art

    The Garment District Alliance has worked hard to evolve the area from a faded industrial center to a revitalized business district committed to bringing art to the streets. The post The Garment District: From Buttons and Bows to a Home for Art […]

  • United States of the Art: Six Destinations for the Great American Road Trip

    A cross-country road trip provides plenty of opportunities to create art. The post United States of the Art: Six Destinations for the Great American Road Trip appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • How Does a Photography Business Make Money?

    Photographers are uniquely positioned within the art world to earn money through various revenue streams. Here's how you find work. The post How Does a Photography Business Make Money? appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • The Basics of Insurance Part II: Health Insurance for Artists

    In this article, we’ll a type of insurance that you’ll want to think about as you build your art business – health insurance for artists. The post The Basics of Insurance Part II: Health Insurance for Artists appeared first on […]

  • The Emergence of the Creative Entrepreneur

    The term “starving artist” has long been part of our lexicon, signifying the significant struggle artists face bringing their creative work to market. For the lucky few that survive until they have paid their dues, the career can be […]

  • Seth Godin and Marketing for the Art World

    A good marketing strategy can help grow a business if done well. Let Seth Godin show you how to be a modern marketer in his skillshare video series. The post Seth Godin and Marketing for the Art World appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • These Five Companies Put the Art in Startup

    Technology and art are intersecting in more ways than ever, and today’s art startups are revolutionizing the way art is consumed and collected. Entrepreneurs have been intersecting art and technology since the start of the .com boom. Portfolio […]

  • The Art Museum In The Digital Age

    I talked with Steve Konick, Director of Public Relations and Marketing for the Currier Museum of Art, in Manchester, New Hampshire, to understand why art museums are still relevant The post The Art Museum In The Digital Age appeared first on […]

  • Should I Open a Corporation for My Art Business?

    About 375,000 visual artists claim to be self-employed yet many don't realize that their personal assets can be at risk. Find out how opening a corporation can help protect you. The post Should I Open a Corporation for My Art Business? appeared […]

  • Model Citizens and Protected Images: Work-for-Hire and Right of Publicity

    Last week, we discussed model releases, and an example concerning a model whose image was being used by a company in a more liberal manner than what had originally been agreed upon by the model and the company. You may recall that in this instance, […]

  • Does Copyright and Trademark Law Protect 3D Printing?

    3D printing is a relatively new art form is sweeping the internet and worrying designers and Hollywood executives alike. Along with the advent of 3D printing, a steady stream of piracy and copyright infringement cases have been reported by industry […]

  • Consider this tip before signing an International Art Contract

    Most art galleries participate in art fairs throughout the year. Many of those fairs are international, such as Art Basel Switzerland or the Hong International Art Fair. International art fairs are an excellent way to position your gallery in […]

  • Six Steps to Safer Image Sharing

    Despite the unfortunate reality that image sharing on the Internet can lead to misappropriation of your work, there are some steps that can minimize the risks. The post Six Steps to Safer Image Sharing appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Does Freedom of Speech Protect Taking Photos of People Through Windows?

    Fine art Photographer Arne Svenson spent a year secretly taking photos of the Fosters, a family living across the street from his home. Does the Foster's Right to Privacy outweigh Svenson's Freedom of Expression? The post Does Freedom of Speech […]

  • Four Reasons Artists Should Hire Lawyers

    Think artists can't afford to hire lawyers? Actually, artists can't afford to not have one by their side. Here's four reasons why. The post Four Reasons Artists Should Hire Lawyers appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Death and Taxes: Save Millions Through Careful Estate Planning

    Artists and collectors can minimize estate taxes on artworks by employing a planning strategy and understanding the complexities involved with assessing the work's fair market value. The post Death and Taxes: Save Millions Through Careful Estate […]

  • Can You Spot a Fake? The Trouble with Authenticating Art

    What are the challenges for collectors in authenticating artworks? What are the legal remedies when a purchased artwork is discovered to be a forgery? The post Can You Spot a Fake? The Trouble with Authenticating Art appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Planning for the Copyright Registration Process

    It has become a common refrain among lawyers who represent photographers and other artists that it is important to register your work with the U.S. Copyright Office. Although registration is not required for copyright protection, it is a […]

  • The Basics of Insurance for Artists

    There are many legal aspects of running an art-related business that could be fairly characterized as less than interesting, but few topics inspire more blank stares, or glazed-over eyes, faster than insurance. Like a lot of legal topics, thinking […]

  • Do You Know How to Protect Your Creative Business From a Devastating Lawsuit?

    Running a successful creative venture often involves understanding business just as keenly as you learn your craft, and for artists and gallery owners facing the threat of a lawsuit, it’s important to understand the steps you can take to […]

  • Videographers Must Obtain Music Licensing Rights

    Obtaining music licensing rights for videos is difficult but those that don't receive them are putting themselves and their customers at risk of a copyright infringement lawsuit. The post Videographers Must Obtain Music Licensing Rights appeared […]